Hi, I've just started studying for FRM Part 1 and was planning to refer the core curriculum for the main content and BT questions for practice.
But after completing Chapter 1 : Banks from the core curriculum when I tried to solve the BT question bank for that chapter, I found it very tough, unmanageable to be honest. I felt like I was solving questions for a whole different chapter.
So my question is :
1) Is this normal?
2) What is the level of difficulty going to be in the actual examination?
Thanks in advance.
But after completing Chapter 1 : Banks from the core curriculum when I tried to solve the BT question bank for that chapter, I found it very tough, unmanageable to be honest. I felt like I was solving questions for a whole different chapter.
So my question is :
1) Is this normal?
2) What is the level of difficulty going to be in the actual examination?
Thanks in advance.
Don't get me wrong, I think they are helpful for the first pass. But the new EOC Q&A are symptomatic of a problem. Hopefully you can see how, in response to your question, I can manage to justify a "yes, on a superficial level," (for most but technically not even all!) but the more relevant question is, "How does the P1 material need to improve so that it could be sufficient, on a standalone basis, in order to prepare for the exam?" I suppose EPPs like us should be happy: Part 1 has shifted from standalone sufficiency to (IMO) clearly insufficient as a standalone. Last year, you did not absolutely need EPP help for Part 1, if you were willing to be diligent in the self-study of the assignments. I don't see how you can say that this year. I absolutely predict higher EPP penetration rates in Part 1 (controlling for the virus, of course) due to this. However, in truth, I'm not really happy about this. My first preference is quality and rigor in the syllabus (as I think of myself more as an advocate for the syllabus and candidate experience), if for no other reason that (i) it's important for all of us to have clear expectations about what is expected on the exam but (ii) we are supposed to be leading the profession such that our definitions and concepts should have rigor behind them and be useful in actual work practice. I hope that's helpful ...