Hi David & Co
In the below question why is the standard dev not SQRT(60*0.15*0.85) as it seems like the binomial distribution applies? and therefore the standard error would be SQRT((60*0.15*0.85)/60)
209.1 Nine (9) companies among a random sample of 60 companies defaulted. The companies were each in the same highly speculative credit rating category; statistically, they represent a random sample from the population of CCC-rated companies. The rating agency contends that the historical (population) default rate for this category is 10.0%, in contrast to the 15.0% default rate observed in the sample. Is there statistical evidence, with any high confidence, that the true default rate is different than 10.0%; i.e. if the null hypothesis is that the true default rate is 10.0%, can we reject the null?
a) No, the t-statistic is 0.39
b) No, the t-statistic is 1.08
c) Yes, the t-statistic is 1.74
d) Yes, the t-statistic is 23.53
The answer is 209.1 (b): No, the t-statistic is only 1.08. For a large sample, the distribution is normally approximated, such that at a 5.0% two-tailed significance, we reject if the abs(t-statistic) exceeds 1.96
The standard error = SQRT((15%*85%)/60) = 0.0460098; please note: if you used SQRT(10%*90%/60) for the standard error, that is not wrong, but also would not change the conclusion as the t-statistic is 1.29
The t-statistic = (15%-10%)/0.0460098 = 1.08. The two-sided p-value is 27.8%, but as the t statistic is well below 2.0, we cannot reject.
Thanks
In the below question why is the standard dev not SQRT(60*0.15*0.85) as it seems like the binomial distribution applies? and therefore the standard error would be SQRT((60*0.15*0.85)/60)
209.1 Nine (9) companies among a random sample of 60 companies defaulted. The companies were each in the same highly speculative credit rating category; statistically, they represent a random sample from the population of CCC-rated companies. The rating agency contends that the historical (population) default rate for this category is 10.0%, in contrast to the 15.0% default rate observed in the sample. Is there statistical evidence, with any high confidence, that the true default rate is different than 10.0%; i.e. if the null hypothesis is that the true default rate is 10.0%, can we reject the null?
a) No, the t-statistic is 0.39
b) No, the t-statistic is 1.08
c) Yes, the t-statistic is 1.74
d) Yes, the t-statistic is 23.53
The answer is 209.1 (b): No, the t-statistic is only 1.08. For a large sample, the distribution is normally approximated, such that at a 5.0% two-tailed significance, we reject if the abs(t-statistic) exceeds 1.96
The standard error = SQRT((15%*85%)/60) = 0.0460098; please note: if you used SQRT(10%*90%/60) for the standard error, that is not wrong, but also would not change the conclusion as the t-statistic is 1.29
The t-statistic = (15%-10%)/0.0460098 = 1.08. The two-sided p-value is 27.8%, but as the t statistic is well below 2.0, we cannot reject.
Thanks