Square Root of Time Rule Problem

dennis_cmpe

New Member
I'm having problems applying the square root of time rule for this problem. I converted all the portfolios vars to yearly vars, so that I can compare "apples to apples":

Var2 = Var1 * alpha * squareroot(Time2 / Time1)

So for portfolio #1: 10 * 2.33 * squareroot (252/5) = 165.41

I did this for all the portfolios, but I could not get the order in answer A below. Am I applying the square root of time rule correctly here?



104) Rank the following portfolios from least risky to most risky. Assume 252 trading days a year and there are 5 trading days per week:

Portfolio / Var / Holding Period Days / Confidence Interval
1 / 10 / 5 / 99
2 / 10 / 5 / 95
3 / 10 / 10 / 99
4 / 10 / 10 / 95
5 / 10 / 15 / 99
6 / 10 / 15 / 5

a) 5,3,6,1,4,2
b) 3,4,1,2,5,6
c) 5,6,1,2,3,6
d) 2,1,5,6,4,3

ANSWER: A
 

skcd

New Member
1. 2.33 sqrt(5)
2. 1.645sqrt(5)
3. 2.33 sqrt(10)
4. 1.645sqrt(10)
5. 2.33 sqrt(15)
6. 1.645sqrt(15)

so

1. 5.21
2. 3.6783
3. 7.368
4. 5.2
5. 9.024
6. 6.371

Therefore 5 > 3 > 6 > 1 > 4 > 2

Somehow they mean higher VaR is least risky. I m not sure if that is exactly reverse.
 

riskydawn

New Member
Try this:

Port 1: [10*sqrt(252/5)]/2.33 = 30.469
Port 2: [10*sqrt(252/5)]/1.645 = 43.156
Port 3: [10*sqrt(252/10)]/2.33 = 21.544
Port 4: [10*sqrt(252/10)]/1.645 = 30.516
Port 5: [10*sqrt(252/15)]/2.33 = 17.591
Port 6: [10*sqrt(252/15)]/1.645 = 24.916


Least risky to most risky = Answer A. 5 - 3 - 6 - 1 - 4 - 2
 
Top