Is the Duration based VaR mapping results, always better than Principal Mapping

Sumit.K

New Member
Hi David,
I tried the Bond portfolio mapping with two bonds of 2yrs and 4 yrs maturity.
The spot rates were chosen randomly.
As in this case the average maturity is 3yrs.
and the duration is 3+yrs...
The VaR obtained by duration mapping>VaR obtained by Principal mapping
Thus the duration mapping here is in fact overestimating the VaR ..
Help me out...
 

David Harper CFA FRM

David Harper CFA FRM
Subscriber
Hi sumit,

Isn't the premise the problem: your portfolio duration must be less than portfolio weighted maturity (only an inverse floater can get duration > maturity); or, how did you achieve that outcome?

David
 
Top