Hend Abuenein
Active Member
If you read about the case in a summary (Schweser notes or other) you'll think it happened after. In the narration of the case in GARP's AIM of financial disaster, story says that the recordings where submitted by BT themselves to prove their story against the 2 clients' allegations. The submission of these records showed the bragging.
This sequence tells you implicitly that the bragging was not in the allegations.
This sequence tells you implicitly that the bragging was not in the allegations.
ne model based on apt given needed to find the rrate of return based on it and also one more thing cant remeber
Well, good luck to both of us