"If the CDS spread increases, the premium paid by the fixed-leg counterparty increases. This causes a gain to existing fixed-leg payers, who in retrospect got into their positions cheap" from :P2.T6.308. Credit default swap (CDS) spread curves (Malz section 7.3)
Should'nt the premium remain the same as it is agreed upon before the event? Therefore the fact that the fixed leg is paying the same premium for protection that would now be more expensive constitute the "gain" on the position?
Should'nt the premium remain the same as it is agreed upon before the event? Therefore the fact that the fixed leg is paying the same premium for protection that would now be more expensive constitute the "gain" on the position?