Hi David,
The firm value of 120 is less than the total debt value in this spreadsheet? I am presuming that we are not assuming KMV application of 0.5 times debt in this example. Can you please explain why that is so?
Many thanks in advance.
Irfan
That's from Stulz' example ... I should make the labels better
F = 100 and U = 50 are face (principal) value of debt, so the "current" capital structure implied by the merton model is:
(and the point of the model is to use Merton to infer the prices)
subord = 23.8, senior = 59.6, = equity 36.5 for total value = 120
(agreed, the 0.5 would not enter here b/c this is "straight Merton" not KMV's adaption of)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.