Hi @David Harper CFA FRM
Regarding P2.T5.R36 on page 3 of the Jorion Chapter 6 Study Notes about Backtesting & Exceptions I'm a bit confused by:
"When too many exceptions are observed, the model is “bad” and underestimates risk. This is a major problem because too little capital may be allocated to risk-taking units;"
If the model understimates risk, wouldn't you allocate more capital to the unit?
Intuitively I'd allocate more capital to a less risky activity assuming the same expected return as a more risky activity.
Or is this taking the perspective that the allocation is made after the backtesting results are in, and you can see that the model underestimates risk, so you'll allocate less capital to it than you would have if the model were correctly estimating risk since you can't trust the current model?
Thanks
Karim
Regarding P2.T5.R36 on page 3 of the Jorion Chapter 6 Study Notes about Backtesting & Exceptions I'm a bit confused by:
"When too many exceptions are observed, the model is “bad” and underestimates risk. This is a major problem because too little capital may be allocated to risk-taking units;"
If the model understimates risk, wouldn't you allocate more capital to the unit?
Intuitively I'd allocate more capital to a less risky activity assuming the same expected return as a more risky activity.
Or is this taking the perspective that the allocation is made after the backtesting results are in, and you can see that the model underestimates risk, so you'll allocate less capital to it than you would have if the model were correctly estimating risk since you can't trust the current model?
Thanks
Karim