I don't get why value of debt= PV( 50% * $1B+ 50%* $800M)....?
Is it because of the gold selling at $1400 or $800 per oz, each with 50%,
min ($1,000M< orig debt, $1,400M) = $1,000M
min($1,000M< orig debt, $800M)= $800M
Hi vkichoi please note the source is here (per the link at the end of the answer in the mock on page 25): http://forum.bionicturtle.com/threads/l1-t1-44-debt-overhang.3558/
... I have subsequently edited the question, and I am noticing the mock does not reflect the updated version of the question. Apologies, however I don't see that it impacts your question.
You are almost correct.
50% chance that future firm value will be $1,400 (equal to the price of gold, or
50% chance that future firm value will be $800
The future debt value is then = MIN [firm value, face value] = MIN[firm value, $1,000], which here has two possible outcomes:
MIN[1,400, $1,000]; i.e., debt can be paid in full
MIN[800,$1,000]; i.e., assets exhausted can only pay 800
With the PV of debt equal to the weighted average of the two. I hope that explains, thanks!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.