KMV Credit Monitor Model

dthigale

Member
Hi David,

In the spread sheet 6.d.1, last section calcuating PD with Stulz formula

you have calculated the the numerator value using Debt Value / Firm value ( cell E63/E62). As per formula it is Firm Value / Debt value.

However when I calculate using Firm value / Debt Value I get the same value of N/D as yours -3.00352.

Could you please check?

Also the formla says Log but we have taken LN

2. I am not able to download the spreadsheet 6.c.2 Altamns Cost-plus Pricing. Is it uploaded?

Thanks.

D.
 

David Harper CFA FRM

David Harper CFA FRM
Subscriber
Hi Dinesh,

You are looking at the "supplemental" version. Please look above at row 32. That follows de Servigny's formula and uses Firm Value / Debt.
In which case, PD = N(-DD) = N(-3)

Row 61 is shown merely because Stulz also has a formula in Chapter 18 which uses Face Value Debt / Firm Value. In which case, the normal deviate is -3 instead of 3, with the same result.

I show them both only b/c some are looking at Stulz and some de Servigny; but they are equivalent as the normal is symmetrical. Ultimately, both "approaches " are equivalent.

Re log: he means natural log (LN) as this a same d2 that inputs into Black-Scholes (i.e., lognormal prices)

Re: 6.c.2 looks okay to me ... occassionally, the retreival of the zoho sheet doesn't work, but then just try a hard refresh...but if you have excel, I hope you realize, the most effective was to retreive is to click on the excel link (that is a pointer to the native XLS file) and the excel is always robust whereas the zohos aren't effective for some advanced sheets

David
 
Top