Hi everyone,
In this question I do not get to the term (1+r) = (1-PD)*(1+y) - (1-PD)*(FV/MV)
Could you explain why you use the term behind the minus and how you get to the term?
I would have solved it with the following term:
(1+y)*(1-PD)+PD*RR = 1+r , where PD*RR is canceled out as RR is zero.
So you have y and PD as unknown but you get to y with the following formula regarding the bond: FV*exp(-y)=MV --> 100*exp(-y)=80
But then you get about 23% for y and, if you plug that in the formula above you get around 14% for PD, which is wrong.
Could someone help me with the problem?
Thanks in advance
Peter
In this question I do not get to the term (1+r) = (1-PD)*(1+y) - (1-PD)*(FV/MV)
Could you explain why you use the term behind the minus and how you get to the term?
I would have solved it with the following term:
(1+y)*(1-PD)+PD*RR = 1+r , where PD*RR is canceled out as RR is zero.
So you have y and PD as unknown but you get to y with the following formula regarding the bond: FV*exp(-y)=MV --> 100*exp(-y)=80
But then you get about 23% for y and, if you plug that in the formula above you get around 14% for PD, which is wrong.
Could someone help me with the problem?
Thanks in advance
Peter