premseoul
New Member
Hello All,
It is clrearly evident from the candidate posts/comments across forum thread that many of the candidate felt that actual exam has become taugher in 2016 when compared to previous years.
Most of the candidate stated that May 16 and Nov16 exams were relatevely taugh both in terms of quantative/Qualtitative perspective, plus more verbose (more to read to extract data).
Moreover, many of candidate highlighted that GARP practise papers was not a genuine reflector of what you see in actual exam. (Altough it is subjective)
I just checked the FRM P2 Practise papers for 2017, and my question is : Is it same (almost same) as the FRM P2 parcttise papers of 2016? if yes what would we infer from that?
Thank you for your Input in avdance!!
It is clrearly evident from the candidate posts/comments across forum thread that many of the candidate felt that actual exam has become taugher in 2016 when compared to previous years.
Most of the candidate stated that May 16 and Nov16 exams were relatevely taugh both in terms of quantative/Qualtitative perspective, plus more verbose (more to read to extract data).
Moreover, many of candidate highlighted that GARP practise papers was not a genuine reflector of what you see in actual exam. (Altough it is subjective)
I just checked the FRM P2 Practise papers for 2017, and my question is : Is it same (almost same) as the FRM P2 parcttise papers of 2016? if yes what would we infer from that?
Thank you for your Input in avdance!!