Spronkworks
New Member
Re the barings aib and drysdale. Theres no explicit mention in the core reading on the leverage made by leeson and rusnak, but you could read fictitious and fraudulent accounting and reporting in all three.
While I agree with you on AIB and Barings, Drysdale was a result of a flaw in the market practice for calculating the collateral value of US Treasuries. There was no fictitious or fraudulent accounting in the Drysdale event... they simply borrowed much more money than their capital would have permitted without the flaw. The money was used to make highly leveraged bets in the market, and losses became so large they eventually could not borrow enough to hide them anymore. For their part, both Leeson and Rusnak were supposed to be running small, non-directional arb books, while the readings explicitly state they were running large outright positions and hiding them from management. Thus the common element was size of bet relative to capital, i.e. leverage. That being said, I made the choice reluctantly, by process of elimination...