I feel terrible asking what I assume is an elementary question, but alas, this is why I am here.
David - I do not believe that you address the F statistic's representation as ESS/k / RSS/n-k-1 explicitly anywhere in the S and W videos. Is there some reason this was not covered? Is it equivalent to the expression utilizing the t^2's that you did cover in the lecture? Is the ESS version a heteroskedastic version, i.e., a robust version? Is it always appropriate? Etc.
Thanks!
Brian
David - I do not believe that you address the F statistic's representation as ESS/k / RSS/n-k-1 explicitly anywhere in the S and W videos. Is there some reason this was not covered? Is it equivalent to the expression utilizing the t^2's that you did cover in the lecture? Is the ESS version a heteroskedastic version, i.e., a robust version? Is it always appropriate? Etc.
Thanks!
Brian
Last edited: