Search results

Thanks for your feedback and congratulations, this is a milestone to your career definitely. I tend to share your opinion actually, am also done with FRM Part 2 and been through CFA level 2 a while ago so I think yes, CFA is harder because of the breadth and scope of the material, 10 topics is...

Congratulations! and good luck to next year's candidates. One question, how did you find the CFA as compared to FRM, level 2 and 3 compared to 1 and 2 of the FRM. Thanks

well actually I think the minimum passing score is definitely below 70%, I assume it is between 55% and 60% which explains why the pass rate is higher. But still i'd like to point out that even if some have 4th quartiles somewhere it is completely understandable to see a pass mark. As you can...

happy for you jeff, best of luck to others :)

congratulations everyone

so guys frm exam results ou! hope we have a pass for everyone !!!

i think this one is simply equity loses all and others are left unimpaired. I still remember the numbers it was 76.54 million and they added up exactly to amount to be paid to mezzanine and senior :)

i think the question was, what increases risk taking behavior not how to mitigate it so i think answer is higher incentive fees

25 to 28 questions unanswered yet on this forum...

yes thats what am saying

hi hi, i think its independent amount, minimum transfer would not mitigate collateral volatility

solvency accounts for correlations between risks when basel doesn't.

i understand your views and I hope you're right. Still predatory lending as I see it is lending someone without them meeting the necessary requirements, its not just about the rate. If you lend 1000,000 USD for 6% ( sub prime) or 4 million dollars for 2% ( prime ) what will be the interest paid...

but its not only about the rate. its about the LTV ratio so I can also say that even if the rate is lower the amount could be bigger and the creditworthiness of the borrowers worse. you know what I think there are a lot of issues that are very subjective and thats too bad

i thought the prime subprime is right, why will they induce some prime borrower into subprime loans? the contrary is true, the can induce a sub prime borrower to thinking they could borrow as if they were prime borrowers

actually remembered that question. it was about remargining period for both collateralized and un-collateralized positions. so it was take same period or shorter for collateralized one

its fine 3 questions is marginal, hope we all pass

no i remember it was how to account for some factor for both loans or something like that. so either both same factor or the one backed by collateral has shorter risk factor dont remember as well

i hardly remember anything on this one do you have more details ?

tricky but sometimes feels like we need more details