Search results

  1. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    Where do you get these numbers from?..like 68 as top 5th percentile,2800 and garp using 75% of that as cuttoff?..look i am not doubting but 50 seems to be pretty high for 55% of the people to clear..wud be great if u can share the source
  2. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    From where did you got the number?..GARP never publishes it if i am right...last year number of people qualifying % in nov was 54% and 50% in may... not the score 50..this info was published
  3. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    Thats the beauty of this paper..once you leave the exam hall you are confident and in next day or two you dont know what you messed up..and there would be many with that feeling..
  4. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    I know many people who gave the exam and quoted that around 45+ is a good/comfortable score
  5. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    No way buddy..assuming if you didn't meant 50%-55%..
  6. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    This is my gut feel...i dont think it can go beyond like 40 or 44 max..someone on this forum quoted 50 to 55 thats around 63% to 70% score..which is impossible for a minimum percentile score unless grap wants to have a passing rate of around 25% only...GARP has been maintaining a pass rate of...
  7. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    Thats correct..i dont remember the exact ques but this would increase volatility but expected value will not change
  8. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    I went for the same with the same logic
  9. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    With your snapshot i guess i got it wrong here
  10. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    For MVAR i remember to select the option with asset 1 and asset 3..but there were 2 options with both these assets so i dont remember..Low beta was the biggest clue..and i guess i have also gone for external audit but not sure..
  11. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    I believe to be sure on this as i knew a problem in john c hull specifically on this
  12. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    In john c hull..i wrongly used the word bimodal but incase of jumps you will not have smooth volatility smile but 2 peaks
  13. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    I I guess to have have the same answers as yours
  14. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    I think thats right..GP with frequency..i can be wrong but i have done basis the logic i quoted in the comment above
  15. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    Yes..retail depositors were shielded
  16. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    Bimodal like graph with 2 peaks
  17. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    There were 2 parts to the question..1) threshold (so it cant be gev bit has to be POT or GPD) 2) pot, gpd and gev are probability dist functions with a location or threshold parameter and scale and tail index..they model the probability function of tail events..so i went for PARETO and FREQUENCY
  18. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    I dont remember what i answered and what were th..but It has to pareto and frequency bcz both GPD GEV and POT are frequency dist functions
  19. A

    Exam Feedback May 2017 Part 2 Exam Feedback

    Woohooo...thats like around a min per question..
Top