Also I have another question:
If nothing is specified in a question should we assume that the loss distribution follow NORMAL distribution and so that we can say that VaR will be subadditive?
David,
Thanks for such a super fast reply.
So this means that the VaR of the combined portfolio will be less than or atleast equal to VaR(A)+ VaR(B)
Am I right?
David,
I have one question. What should be the answer to a question like this:
If portfolio A has a VaR of 100 and portfolio B has a VaR of 200, then the VaR of the portfolio C (= A + B) ?
I know that VaR is not subadditive. But in case we assume normal distribution of loss then it...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.