Email from GARP: "Whenever a work experience is resubmitted, it is considered a new submission and is placed in the queue based on the latest date of submission."
Sweet! - exactly what I expected. The human on the phone had the same message.
I did try to call. Turns out they leave early on summer Fridays. Got their vm after multiple tries. It’s around 1pm in their NJ HQ, they are already gone. I’ll try again on Monday. I feel so disgusted right now. This spoils my whole weekend. At least now I know which org I definitely don’t want...
What did you guys enter as the experience END date? I couldn't submit with 'present or current'. So I just put a future date. Now its been denied. Ridiculous! I have to resubmit. I just resubmitted with today's date as the experience end date. Hopefully they won't put me back to the end of the line.
David, is it correct to say that while RAROC adjusts returns for only non-systemic/firm-specific risk (by deducting the expected loss), ARAROC adjusts for both systemic and non-systemic risk (by also deducting the equity beta)? Thank you!
Has anyone been able to find the 3 Mark Carey ORR assigned readings (from the GARP Risk Institute) online? A search does not bring up anything. Is my understanding correct that the content covered in those readings is exactly what is in Hull Chapters 15 & 16? Thank you!
@Nicole Seaman This might be a silly question, but is there any difference between P1 and L1 in the question names? Is it just a name change from 'Part' to 'Level'? In other words, are both P1 and L1 questions relevant for part 1 prep? Thanks!
Thank you David. You're right! I was indeed thinking about distribution of a univariate sample mean. Makes sense that for the regression's slope coefficient, the variance would embed the sigma^2/n term but also include the variance of the explanatory variable.
Hi David, the solution to this problem says that for a test with size alpha, the probability of including a single irrelevant regressor is 1-alpa. Shouldn't this probability be alpha instead, which is basically the probability of making a Type 1 error (reject a true null is equivalent to...
Hi David, Equation 7.11 in the 2020 GARP Book 2 says that per the CLT, the estimate of the slope coefficient (beta_hat) follows a normal distribution with mean centered around the true slope and the variance = sigma^2/[n*sigma_x^2]. If this is true, then why do we assume the variance of beta_hat...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.