I find this a little unintuitive, although I do have it stored in memory.
Let spot at time 1 = 100 and futures at
time 1 = 80 and spot at time 2 = 120 and futures at time 2 = 110.
Clearly, basis at time 1 = 20 and the basis at time 2 = 10, so the basis has weakened.
The magnitude of the basis is the "risk" or the degree of mismatch - I think we all agree on this.
Then let spot at time 1 = 100 and futures at time 1 = 150 and spot at time 2 = 100 and futures at time 2 = 200.
Clearly, basis at time 1 = -50 and the basis at time 2 = -100, so the basis has weakened.....???
Weakened? This is not intuitive to me.
The basis (or mismatch) has worsened!!!! So it seems more natural to describe this as a strengthening of the basis but that doesn't appear to be the approach used in practice.
Let spot at time 1 = 100 and futures at
time 1 = 80 and spot at time 2 = 120 and futures at time 2 = 110.
Clearly, basis at time 1 = 20 and the basis at time 2 = 10, so the basis has weakened.
The magnitude of the basis is the "risk" or the degree of mismatch - I think we all agree on this.
Then let spot at time 1 = 100 and futures at time 1 = 150 and spot at time 2 = 100 and futures at time 2 = 200.
Clearly, basis at time 1 = -50 and the basis at time 2 = -100, so the basis has weakened.....???
Weakened? This is not intuitive to me.
The basis (or mismatch) has worsened!!!! So it seems more natural to describe this as a strengthening of the basis but that doesn't appear to be the approach used in practice.