Search results

Its possible though. Let's hope for the best. I am already taking this as final result anyway.

You mean they have drawn inverted graphs of quartiles and wrote incorrectly fair,excellent,good ....but "pass/fail" is correct? Congrats to passed candidates!!

Congratulations!!

Go to Exam results page and click on view exam result letter for previous FRM part 1 Just change url part to May 19 from existing one and it will show insufficient privileges. Thats what I get when I see results after changing date

Either way I'll be happy as I didn't get time to study this exam and can nail it with 11111 like part 1. ;)

I hope so, but rationality suggests that we can think we may be bottom scorers on that percentile and have a low total score. Lets hope for best on official update

Doesn't make any sense on reversal methodology of quartiles. e.g. my quartile pdf says for Credit Risk - 76th to 100th percentile and Candidates scoring i this quartile demonstrated an excellent understanding of the subject. So it should be 1 overll is 31222 and fail similar case is for many

Yep only quartiles, no result letter But it is showing "Fail" in Myprogram page

Sorry to hear that my friend. I have 31222 and it is showing failed, as of now till the results are offically out, I feel I could be just on border of those 2s and 1 and adding up less that passed guys. Though my exam was not so bad.

Yes I could download PDF It is also showing a option costing $100 for revaluation of results

Change Date on mobile, i put 28 June Got Google Chrome browser, login to mygarp put Desktop site mode on Click on "Exam Results" in menu on top right corner menu option You can see both 1 and 2 results and even download it It is available on My programs as well.

seems like if you get even a single 3, its v bad for results. Very tight competition here

my mistake.it's corrected just change date and check you can download results

31222 and failed

Passed with 1.1.1.1, Thanks a ton to Bionic Turtle and especially to David Harper and his wonderful explanations.

Congratulations guys! :-)

Just logged in. got reminder updated and name's on list :)

5. Pardon me this has been discussed earlier though remained incomplete. SSE was given as 458 and SSR as 252. So total SST was 700. For finding R sq. we neded SS explained by regression / total SS = 252/700 = 0.36 and correlation = sqrt(.36) = 0.6 I got this answer. Does it seem correct?

One question on risk management failure. One of options was wrong distribution assumption made. Don't remember exactly.

One on risk management failure. Wrong distribution something I guess