Dear David,
There is a very basic formula that I'd like to double check with you, which concerns the targeting of total portfolio duration. The formula is shown on page 307 page of FRM 5th Handbook under the section ' Duration Hedging", where it says that in order for us to achieve a target duration Dv for an existing portfolio S (modified duration is Ds*) though futures hedging (modified duration of the future is Df*), the number of futures to short or long is:
N = (Dv*V - Ds*S) / (Df*F)
The point I'd like to double check is whether V = S+ NxF in this formula and S = existing portfolio value and F = contract size for one future contract. My point is that since future contracts will be entered into by the hedger, they should form a part of the new portfolio too, leading a change in the final portfolio value. However, I doubt my own thought since V = S+ NxF would mean that we have to transform this formula again to solve for N since N will appear on both sides of the equation.
Can you kindly correct my misunderstanding? And do you have any practice question that uses this formula, except those for targeting 0 duration?
Thanks for your enlightenment!
Cheers!
Liming
1/11/2009
There is a very basic formula that I'd like to double check with you, which concerns the targeting of total portfolio duration. The formula is shown on page 307 page of FRM 5th Handbook under the section ' Duration Hedging", where it says that in order for us to achieve a target duration Dv for an existing portfolio S (modified duration is Ds*) though futures hedging (modified duration of the future is Df*), the number of futures to short or long is:
N = (Dv*V - Ds*S) / (Df*F)
The point I'd like to double check is whether V = S+ NxF in this formula and S = existing portfolio value and F = contract size for one future contract. My point is that since future contracts will be entered into by the hedger, they should form a part of the new portfolio too, leading a change in the final portfolio value. However, I doubt my own thought since V = S+ NxF would mean that we have to transform this formula again to solve for N since N will appear on both sides of the equation.
Can you kindly correct my misunderstanding? And do you have any practice question that uses this formula, except those for targeting 0 duration?
Thanks for your enlightenment!
Cheers!
Liming
1/11/2009