Yeah, same thoughts for me. But I had the feeling that the analysts argued primary about the market volatilities and financial distress from the emerging market, so hence Sponsor Risk for me. But of course....its free for interperations and guesses...no really good question....
Don't know the question exactly but I had in mind "ghost effect" due to the rolling horizon and hence and increasing VaR, but im not sure if Im getting confused with another question
I choose Rehypothecation and Reduction of Exposure (Libor > OIS, hence denominator gets bigger and Exposure smaller), FVA with OIS or Libor should be irrelevant or at least not "easier"
For me it felt like Part I - only with 20 questions less and hence more time to think on the questions...(and I also think that 20-30% of my learning time was wasted (again)...especially regarding the quantitative formulas)
For me it is kind of strange / frustrating (same feeling for Part I in May) to learn about 30 slides of formula and at the end you have got primary quantitative questions about VaR/L-VaR/Fund Surplus... Not a single question (!) about Binomial Trees (as far as I remember) or IR-Models (similar...
Hi all
I hope my questions fits in this topic area.
I would like to know if someone has experience with ES as a daily Risk Measurement Tool for financial Institutions? Within my Bank there are thoughts to change VaR against ES as the new daily risk measurement (respectively as the tool with...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.