I also purchased the Schweser notes before purchasing BT's product as I assumed they would be better (by default) given their domination with the CFA. I couldn't have been more wrong - the schweser product is terrible for the FRM! Absolutely terrible. Just keep preparing with the BT...
I agree with Shakti.
While it is true that simple math is predominant, there is some higher level statistics throughout, which I would argue is math at the end of the day. Still, it is limited.
I passed 1 with 2112 (if I remember correctly) and I used the following approach. I might add that I take a very long time to prepare as I have 2 very young children (4 and 1). Hence, I am still preparing for part II but I am using the same approach.
1) Reach original reading.
2) Watch...
I am hoping this doesn't come across the wrong way.....I am happy for @blazei
I feel like passing someone with 44411 is a disservice to the credential.
I would try to be conscientious about recruiting partners to study away from this forum - I am not suggesting that you are doing that.....which is why I asked.
I wouldn't want someone to be poaching from this site to benefit another or at the expense of BT. ...my two cents.
Hi @David Harper CFA FRM
I am a bit confused by the description that partial autocorrelation function as the coefficient if the most distant term after regressing the current in the past series. Don't we have only one series here, and therefore, only 1 sample point for each independent...
It would also be great if you posted for practice exam scores (if you took any) here:
https://forum.bionicturtle.com/threads/practice-exam-scores.8191/
The CAPM says that the expected return on an asset E(R) is equal to the risk free rate + Beta*(Market Return minus the risk free rate) OR E(R) = risk free rate + Beta*(Market Risk Premium).
Let Risk Free Rate = X and Market Risk PRemium = Y.
Then we have 2 equations and 2 unknowns, as below...
Here is my question, to reiterate.
Let Y = Xo + B1X1 + B2X2 + u.
Then, assume Z = X2^2 (or X2^3 or any other nonlinear relationship, like Z = sqrt(X2), etc.) AND assume that Z is a determinant of Y.
Then, is there there OVB?
We have that Y is dependent on Z which is one of the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.