yes, 'pure' strangle implied minimum sizes mismatch (even as to minimize d/hedge). But there's more important, unlike you case, that options was OTM.
for 0,6198 & -0,5591 deltas (10cll + 20pt), to delta-neutral need +498 underlyying
hi, @rejdi94
some explanation need for ('you strangle' exposure leg's sizes):
1. are '10 & 20 items' the numbers of opion contracts by 100 underlying shares each?
hi, @David Harper CFA FRM .sorry, much...
can u clarify one feature (across 'Convention' tasks) for me:
i noticed, that indifferent from task ('direct' for that %rate is derived from quoted price or 'reverse' when quoted price calc is target from %) day-count rescaling performed at last step...
i already replied same (like) qstn prev feedback, in this topic lamda != (isn't equal) 5, however u solving approache is true.
and also i've felt regret b/c somebodies posters both can't carefull read old feedbacks and post and recall exam qstn content withOUT minimal required acuuracy.
can somebody recall (or simply type U selected answ) accurately qstn concerned regression beta confidence interval construct (where're beta0 =arround +0.58, large sample and 2 option contain hi-bound 1.3+) can't remember all options for qstn, extra condition for beta and confidence lvl.
what's under MSC implied?
i have to details something: in the case of MCS or 'samplErr reducing' precense at a context, bootstrap isn't appropriate mention, b/c bootstrap is independent simulation method (differ from MC conceptually)
is u implied qstn containing CHF net bought& NFA & CHF exchange rate change as inputs?
genneraly, cs(0;t) can derive from LGD&PD, can uremember other alternatives?
i think that depend on qstn context: for 'what kind MITIGATE' - must be c/party, but for 'TRANSFER to' U answer is right.
yep, 'advancer' want to be a float receiver
hi, All. can Someone remember QSTN(s) concerned conditional probability and 'beta's adjusting'? and also:
there was (!quality) qstns about VaR approaches typology, their features & hs/hybrid approaches quant.qstns? thx
Hi, @ShaktiRathore
i support U view concern there's no direct responsibility of Audit (committee or unit) amid OR internal reporting, however, think - regulatory requirments (reporting) in case inconsistent OR assesment/info can be violated that relate to committee responsibility.
And also...
hi All, hi @David Harper CFA FRM, when i solve Q316.1 using calculator (N = 4, PV = -101.7820, PMT = 2, FV = 100) or excel, there is I/Yr = 3.13 % result. this result mismatch the posted answers, and i'm confused that it exceed z(4) [sr interest rate]. this obstacle return me back to...
hi, @David Harper CFA FRM.
When U calc Theoretical F(0), derived from S(0) (cell D18 xls sheet) doubling of 'u' under exp() 's argument occur. Pls, explain this.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.